|
By Steve Selengut
Looking for good news in today's markets is
like searching for the proverbial needle in a haystack. Needless to
say, practically all investment grade equities and nearly all closed
end funds that specialize in providing regular recurring monthly
income have been reduced in market value by this prolonged
correction. The quake has spread in all directions form its
financial epicenter, and the mounting doom and gloom has taken its
toll on even the most rational investment decision makers. Try to
keep in mind that the purpose of income investing is the income that
your portfolio produces not an increase in the securities' market
values---
So here's the good news (and for anyone
with a 40% or higher income asset allocation, or an income portfolio
being used for living expenses), it really is very good news. Base
income levels, from the beginning of the stock market correction in
June '07 until mid-July '08, have barely changed at all. In fact,
they have probably risen in properly asset allocated portfolios. I
have examined the regular recurring monthly income distributed by 56
taxable income CEFs and 61 tax-free income CEFs, and the conclusions
are pretty remarkable.
In spite of the fact that the vast majority
of my favorite monthly income producers are lower in market value
than I would like, the amount of income they are distributing to
shareholders has not moved lower meaningfully--- even though the
Federal Reserve has reduced interest rates by approximately 60%
during the past twelve months. Here are the numbers:
(1) 48% of the taxable-income CEFs are
distributing precisely the same amount per share as they did a year
ago. Fourteen issues have increased their payouts and fifteen have
reduced them.
The net result is a decrease of just fourteen cents (2.5% of the
total monthly payout). The average current yield on the portfolio,
as of mid July '07, is 9.86% without considering any capital gains
distributions. Additionally, the group is selling at market prices
that reflect an average discount of nearly 11% from NAV. Is that
special or what? The bonds, preferred stocks, government securities
are priced 11% below their current market values.
(2) The numbers are similar with regard to
the 61 tax-free income CEFs: 46% have not altered their payout over
the past twelve months; eighteen have reduced their payout slightly,
and 15 have increased the monthly dole. The net difference for the
group over the past year is less than one cent, or a percentage
change of two-tenths of one percent. Remarkable. This group is
selling at an average discount from NAV of 9.1% and has a current
tax-free yield of 5.51%.
(3) Of 117 individual issues, about half
have produced stable income. The others have accounted for a total
payout reduction of less than 15 cents--- a measly 1.7%. Why is
this amount of little consequence? Two reasons really.
First of all, a properly asset-allocated
income portfolio does not disburse all of the base income it
receives, so there is income available to reinvest in more shares of
income producing securities. This process assures a growing cash
flow to calm your fear of rising prices. The other reason is a bit
more hypothetical. The Fed has lowered rates significantly, a
process that normally produces higher prices for income securities.
Eventually, those lower interest rates (even if global pressures
convince politicians to take back some of the reductions) should
produce higher prices (i.e., profit taking opportunities) in these
securities.
Admittedly, even if your asset allocation
has been fine tuned for years, lower portfolio market values in this
area make stock market valuation shrinkage feel even worse. But the
value of stable cash flow becomes painfully clear for investors who
misguidedly depend on capital gains for their spending money.
Properly asset allocated portfolios contain enough base income
generators to pay the bills. The purpose of capital gains is to
produce proportionately more base income generators.
The purpose of this email is simply to bring
some needed sunlight into an investment environment that is far
gloomier than I think it needs to be. If you want the details,
you'll have to request them personally.
Steve Selengut
http://www.sancoservices.com
http://www.kiawahgolfinvestmentseminars.com/
Professional Portfolio Management since 1979
Author of: "The Brainwashing of the American Investor: The Book that
Wall Street Does Not Want YOU to Read", and "A Millionaire's Secret
Investment Strategy"
Return to Articles Home Page
|