“No QE3″, Retracement Level Stalls Financials
Since financial stocks make up 14% of the S&P 500 Index, it is difficult to sustain a rally without strength in banks and financial services firms. With the Fed and ECB opening up the liquidity fire hydrant in late December 2011, bank stocks experienced another in a series of monster bailout rallies. As outlined below, the Financials Select Sector ETF (XLF) may be poised to give back some gains over the coming sessions based on numerous factors including reduced odds of QE3.
Unfortunately in the debt-saddled world we live in, central banks may be the most important driver of asset prices. Dallas Fed President Richard Fisher told reporters after a speech Wednesday:
There will be no QE3. I will support no QE3, no additional mortgage-backed securities, no additional Treasuries. Wall Street keeps dangling QE3 out there – I think it’s a fantasy of Wall Street – it’s not going to happen, it’s not necessary.
As we outlined in a January 16 video, the Fed, via currency swaps, and the ECB, via unlimited three-year loans, are already keeping the money printers busy. While there is no formal QE, the Fed is still injecting new money into the global financial system in a “QE-like” fashion (see How QE Boosts Stocks).
It is not unusual for markets to hesitate at key Fibonacci retracement levels, such as 61.8%. Therefore, the comments below will take on more meaning if the financials ETF shows signs of a reversal. A close below 14.42 would increase the odds of more sustained weakness. The 61.8% retracement of the losses from the spring high to October low sits at 14.61 (see right side of chart below). One more push toward 14.91 would fit well into an intermediate-term topping process; the same can be said for an S&P 500 move toward 1,363. Continue reading
The Fed Resumes Printing
By Bud Conrad, Casey Research
The Federal Reserve recently announced important policy changes after its Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) meeting. Here are the three most important takeaways, in its own words:
- The Committee decided today to keep the target range for the federal funds rate at 0 to 1/4 percent and currently anticipates that economic conditions – including low rates of resource utilization and a subdued outlook for inflation over the medium run – are likely to warrant exceptionally low levels for the federal funds rate at least through late 2014.
- The Committee judges that inflation at the rate of 2 percent, as measured by the annual change in the price index for personal consumption expenditures, is most consistent over the longer run with the Federal Reserve’s statutory mandate. In the most recent projections, FOMC participants’ estimates of the longer-run normal rate of unemployment had a central tendency of 5.2 percent to 6.0 percent.
- The Fed released FOMC participants’ target federal funds rate for the next few years.
Immediate Reactions Continue reading
Fed To ‘Hold Off’ On QE 3
We noted extreme levels of optimism earlier today. What could possibly trigger a correction in stocks and commodities? If the Fed fails to signal and/or announce another round of quantitative easing (QE), it would undoubtedly leave the markets disappointed.
The Fed uses the Wall Street Journal (WSJ) as a medium to communicate with the markets. It is possible someone at the Fed picked up the phone and said, “We need to temper short-term expectations for another round of QE. Can you help us out?” Friday’s WSJ has an article titled “Fed Holds Off For Now on Bond Buys”. Notice the word “may” is not included. Here is the first paragraph of the article:
Federal Reserve officials are waiting to see how the economy performs before deciding whether to launch another bond-buying program.
The statement above is very direct; it does not contain “expected to” or “analysts believe the Fed will”. While anything can happen next week, the WSJ is always Continue reading
The US Government Is Bankrupt
By Doug Casey, Casey Research
Everyone knows that the US government is bankrupt and has been for many years. But I thought it might be instructive to see what its current cash-flow situation actually is. At least insofar as it’s possible to get a clear picture.
As you know, the so-called Super Committee recently tried to come up with a plan to cut the deficit by $1.5 trillion and failed completely. To anyone who understands the nature of the political process, the failure was, of course, as predictable as it was shameful. What’s even more shameful, though, is that the sought-after $1.5 trillion cut wasn’t meant to apply to the annual budget but to the total budget of the next 10 years – a fact that is rarely mentioned.
Now whenever the chattering classes talk about cuts, it’s always about cuts over the course of 10 years. Which is a dodge, partly because most of the supposed cuts will be scheduled for the end of the period, but also because new programs, new emergencies and hidden contingencies will creep in to offset any announced cuts. So the numbers below aren’t a worst case; they’re the rosiest possible scenario. People have thought I was joking when, asked how bad the Greater Depression was going to be, I answered that it would be worse than even I thought it would be. But I haven’t been joking. Continue reading
Market Turbulence
Alan Greenspan was appointed Fed chairman by Ronald Reagan in August 1987, he was reappointed by Bush and Clinton, at successive four-year intervals until retiring after a record-setting tenure on January 31, 2006.
During that time period he was one of the most powerful men in the world. The stock markets literally hung on his every word. People made it their full time job to try and decipher what cryptic meaning might be obtained from his press releases.
At times his words boosted the market as he dealt with issues like the Black Monday stock market crash that occurred shortly after he first became chairman. At other times he tried to talk the market down and he referred to the “dot-com” economic boom of the 1990s as “irrational exuberance”.
During his tenure as FED chairman Greenspan was famous for purposely giving technical and confusing speeches. U.S. News & World Report reported that, “Few can confuse Wall Street as thoroughly as Federal Reserve Board Chairman Alan Greenspan can.”
Greenspan even mocked his own speaking style in 1988 when he said, Continue reading
Why the System is Coming Unglued
It is ironic that a country that was built on a system of checks and balances now has a monetary system that is accountable to no one… the way our monetary system is structured, the government can literally print money and spend it on anything, no matter how foolish … it has no checks and balances. And so according to many estimates the unfunded liabilities run $75 to $100 trillion… these can never be paid off. It has grown to this level because there are no real operating principles other than buying the votes needed to get re-elected and to stay in office for as long as they can.
If you would have asked anybody on this planet five, six years ago, if the US government could run a $1.5-trillion deficit they would have said no way. But here we are. The numbers are so large most people can’t even comprehend them. What is the difference between a trillion and a hundred trillion? Do we know? Does the average American care?
To solve the current problem in America would require draconian efforts that would immediately cost the politicians their jobs. It would be political suicide… so politicians can’t get the job done. “Now” is never the “right” time for a politician to address the problem so they just “kick the can down the road” and the problem just gets worse and worse until it blows up spectacularly.
In this video our host Stefan Molyneux speaks with Casey Research Managing Director David Galland about the debt situation in the US…Tim McMahon, editor
Five Things You Need to Know About the Economy
By David Galland, Managing Director, Casey Research
At any point during the recent negotiations in Washington over the debt, did you seriously think for even a second that the U.S. was about to default?
Of course, in time the U.S. government (along with many others) will default. However, they are highly unlikely to do so by decree or even through the sort of legislative inaction recently on display. Rather, it will come about through the time-honored tradition of screwing debtors via the slow-roasting method of monetary inflation.
Yet most people still bought into the latest drama put on by the Congressional Players – a troupe of actors whose skills at pretense and artifice might very well qualify them for gilded trophies at awards banquets. Instead, rather than glittering statuettes, these masters of the thespian arts settle for undeserved honorifics and the pole position at the public trough. Followed by lifelong pensions. Continue reading
US Economic Situation “Intractable”
Over the last few years we’ve often mentioned the situation that the government has gotten itself into and wondered how it was ever going to be able to get iteslf out. The speculation has been that a period of hyperinflation might be the only option. In today’s article David Galland editor of the Casey report discusses the economic bind the government is in and just what options it has. ~Tim McMahon, editor
By David Galland, The Casey Report
In describing the current situation in these United States, and in many of the world’s other superpowers, we here at Casey Research have often used the word “intractable”… as in, “impossible to resolve.”
While that may not be technically accurate – because there is no problem related to economics that can’t be solved if one is willing to swallow sufficiently strong medicine – it is a correct assessment, given the overwhelming role that politics now play in the economy.
In a recent edition of The Casey Report, I observed that the largest and most persistent bubble of all over the last half-century has been the bubble in government – making the ones witnessed in dot-com stocks and housing mere blips by comparison.
The following chart is particularly illustrative of that contention.
As you can see…
What Most People Don’t Realize About The Fed’s Superpowers
Since its creation in 1913, the primary intended role of the U.S. Federal Reserve Bank has been that of protector. In theory, the central bank was bestowed with the power to shape monetary policy in a way that would keep both booms and busts in check. The two main tools at its disposal — interest rates and money creation — would provide a “ceiling of normalcy” above expansions AND a “net of safety” below contractions.
To this day, the financial mainstream holds great faith in the Fed’s ability to fulfill its save-the-day duties — as these recent news items make plain:
- “Why Raising Fed Funds Rate Is Positive For Equities.” (Seeking Alpha)
- “Fed’s Moves Lift All Asset Classes.” (Associated Press)
- “US Stocks Erasing Losses: The aggressive moves of the Fed have been an important driver for the stabilization of stock prices.” (Bloomberg)
Understanding the Federal Reserve Bank
What’s a greater threat to the U.S. economy — inflation or deflation?
To decide that… it helps to understand what role the U.S. Federal Reserve plays.
Despite so much focus on the policies of the Fed, its operations remain somewhat of a mystery to most investors — in no smaller measure, due to their complexity.
Here’s an excerpt of a 35-page report that explains the Fed, its goals and, very importantly, its limitations in layman’s terms. Continue reading
